Re: global temporary tables
| От | Josh Berkus |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: global temporary tables |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4BD4B44B.6030406@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | global temporary tables (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: global temporary tables
Re: global temporary tables |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert,
> (1). What I *think* it is supposed to mean is that the table is a
> permanent object which is "globally" visible - that is, it's part of
> some non-temp schema like public or $user and it's column definitions
> etc. are visible to all backends - and it's not automatically removed
> on commit, backend exit, etc. - but the *contents* of the table are
> temporary and backend-local, so that each new backend initially sees
> it as empty and can then insert, update, and delete data independently
> of what any other backend does.
While closer to the standard, the above definition is a lot less useful
than what I believe a lot of people want, which is a table which is
globally visible, but has no durability; that is, it does not get
WAL-logged or recovered on restart. Certainly this latter definition
would be far more useful to support materialized views.
-- -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: