Greg,
> I'm not saying someone can't jump right into (3), using the current
> implementations for (1) and (2) that are floating around out there. I
> just think it would end up wasting a fair amount of work on prototypes
> that don't work quite the same way as the eventual fully integrated
> version. You certainly can start working on (3) without a fully fleshed
> out implementation of (2), I don't know that it makes sense to work on
> before (1) though.
What would be the use case for (1) by itself?
-- -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com