Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Forbid using pg_xlogfile_name() and pg_xlogfile_name_offset()

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Heikki Linnakangas
Тема Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Forbid using pg_xlogfile_name() and pg_xlogfile_name_offset()
Дата
Msg-id 4BBC5D1C.5050304@enterprisedb.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Forbid using pg_xlogfile_name() and pg_xlogfile_name_offset()
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Forbid using pg_xlogfile_name() and pg_xlogfile_name_offset()
Список pgsql-hackers
(moving to pgsql-hackers)

Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 06:12 +0000, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> Log Message:
>> -----------
>> Forbid using pg_xlogfile_name() and pg_xlogfile_name_offset() during
>> recovery. We might want to relax this in the future, but ThisTimeLineID
>> isn't currently correct in backends during recovery, so the filename
>> returned was wrong.
> 
> Any reason why we couldn't just do this:
> 
> if (RecoveryInProgress())
> {
>     volatile XLogCtlData *xlogctl = XLogCtl;
>     XLogFileName(xlogfilename, xlogctl->ThisTimeLineID, 
>             xlogid, xlogseg);
> }
> else
>     XLogFileName(xlogfilename, ThisTimeLineID, xlogid, xlogseg);
> 
> 
> rather than preventing access to those functions completely?

Because if you do something like
pg_xlogfile_name(pg_last_xlog_receive_location()),
xloctl->ThisTimeLineId would not necessarily be the timeline
corresponding the last received location. Even with
pg_xlogfile_name(pg_last_xlog_replay_location()), there's a small race
condition between those calls; if a checkpoint record is replayed in
between that changes timeline, the returned filename doesn't correspond
the name of the file where the replayed WAL record was read from, as you
would expect.

This commit is a stop-gap solution until we figure out what exactly to
do about that. Masao-san wrote a patch that included the TLI in the
string returned by pg_last_xlog_receive/replay_location() (see
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/3f0b79eb1003030603ibd0cbadjebb09fa4249304ba@mail.gmail.com
and
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/3f0b79eb1003300214r6cf98c46tc9be5d563ccf48db@mail.gmail.com),
but it still wasn't clear it did the right thing in corner-cases where
the TLI changes. Using GetRecoveryTargetTLI() for the tli returned by
pg_last_receive_location() seems bogus, at least.

--  Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Streaming replication and a disk full in primary
Следующее
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [BUGS] BUG #5394: invalid declspec for PG_MODULE_MAGIC