Tom Lane wrote:
>> However, that doesn't solve the fundamental problem, which is that the
>> code in question is pretty much broken for any encoding but Latin1.
>>
>
> Yeah. I don't see an easy fix for it either, but there should be a
> TODO entry about it. In the meantime I'm surprised we didn't insert
> octal escapes already.
>
>
>
Escapes done, TODO added.
cheers
andrew