Re: pgindent bizarreness
| От | Andrew Dunstan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pgindent bizarreness |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4BB6A392.1000801@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | pgindent bizarreness (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Why has pgindent decided to screw up all the FD_SET calls in our code? > See for example > http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/postmaster/pgstat.c.diff?r1=1.188;r2=1.189 > > > This appears to be due to this on mingw: /mingw/include/winsock.h:typedef struct fd_set FD_SET; /mingw/include/winsock2.h:typedef struct fd_set FD_SET; We have a list of excluded symbols in the typdef finding code, which currently consists of this list: 'date','interval','timestamp','ANY' Looks like we should add 'FD_SET' to this list. I'm actually wondering if the list of excluded symbols should go in pgindent rather than the typedef finding code. It would be a very simple change to the pgindent script. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: