Re: [DOCS] Streaming replication document improvements
| От | Josh Berkus |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [DOCS] Streaming replication document improvements |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4BB4EAB4.3020904@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [DOCS] Streaming replication document improvements (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [DOCS] Streaming replication document improvements
Re: [DOCS] Streaming replication document improvements |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> The thing is, when dealing with new features, we reduce our overall
> maintenance burden if we get it right the first time. Obviously it's
> too late for major changes, but minor adjustments to maintain the POLA
> seem like exactly what we SHOULD be doing right now.
Oh, I agree. Since we have a separate WALSender limit, it seems
counter-intuitive and difficult-to-admin to have the WALSenders also
limited by superuser_connections. They should be their own separate
connection pool, just like the other "background" processes.
However, if this was somehow infeasible, it wouldn't be hard to
document. That's all.
--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: