Re: Parallel pg_dump for 9.1
| От | Josh Berkus |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Parallel pg_dump for 9.1 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4BB1038E.2020005@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Parallel pg_dump for 9.1 (Joachim Wieland <joe@mcknight.de>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Parallel pg_dump for 9.1
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/29/10 7:46 AM, Joachim Wieland wrote:
> I actually assume that whenever people are interested
> in a very fast dump, it is because they are doing some maintenance
> task (like migrating to a different server) that involves pg_dump. In
> these cases, they would stop their system anyway.
Actually, I'd say that there's a broad set of cases of people who want
to do a parallel pg_dump while their system is active. Parallel pg_dump
on a stopped system will help some people (for migration, particularly)
but parallel pg_dump with snapshot cloning will help a lot more people.
For example, imagine a user who has a 16-core machine on a 14-drive RAID
10, and a 100-table 1TB database. At 2am, this person might reasonaly
want to allocate a large portion of the machine resources to the dump by
giving it 4 threads, without cutting access to the application.
So: if parallel dump in single-user mode is what you can get done, then
do it. We can always improve it later, and we have to start somewhere.But we will eventually need parallel pg_dump on
activesystems, and
that should remain on the TODO list.
-- -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: