Re: proposal: more practical view on function's source code

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Craig Ringer
Тема Re: proposal: more practical view on function's source code
Дата
Msg-id 4BA626EE.302@postnewspapers.com.au
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на proposal: more practical view on function's source code  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: proposal: more practical view on function's source code  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Re: proposal: more practical view on function's source code  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 21/03/2010 8:03 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Hello
>
> Current form of function detail isn't too practical (see screenshot 1)
>
> we can move source code to separate area (maybe we can add rownumbers)
>
> see screenshot 2 (it is only mockup, real implementation can be more
> inteligent in rows numbering)

Ideally, the output of the source listing could be used as input to 
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION without excessive massaging. Those line 
number prefixes make it hard to grab the output of \df+ and do something 
useful with it. Sure, vim's column-edit takes care of them quickly 
enough, but it's still a pain, and if the output format is to be changed 
it might be nice to see it change in a way that makes it easier to 
re-use that source listing.

--
Craig Ringer


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: proposal: more practical view on function's source code
Следующее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: proposal: more practical view on function's source code