Re: 10K vs 15k rpm for analytics

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Kevin Grittner
Тема
Re: 10K vs 15k rpm for analytics
Дата
Msg-id
4B960BD4020000250002FA5D@gw.wicourts.gov
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: 10K vs 15k rpm for analytics Francisco Reyes <lists@stringsutils.com>
Re: 10K vs 15k rpm for analytics Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga@gmail.com>
"Pierre C"  wrote:
> Greg Smith  wrote:
 
>> I'm curious what you feel those weaknesses are.
> 
> Handling lots of small files, especially deleting them, is really
> slow on XFS.
> Databases don't care about that.
 
I know of at least one exception to that -- when we upgraded and got
a newer version of the kernel where XFS has write barriers on by
default, some database transactions which were creating and dropping
temporary tables in a loop became orders of magnitude slower.  Now,
that was a silly approach to getting the data that was needed and I
helped them rework the transactions, but something which had worked
acceptably suddenly didn't anymore.
 
Since we have a BBU hardware RAID controller, we can turn off write
barriers safely, at least according to this page:
 
http://xfs.org/index.php/XFS_FAQ#Q._Should_barriers_be_enabled_with_storage_which_has_a_persistent_write_cache.3F
 
This reduces the penalty for creating and deleting lots of small
files.
 
-Kevin
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления
От: david@lang.hm
Дата:
От: Merlin Moncure
Дата:
FAQ