lionel duboeuf wrote:
> Kevin Grittner a écrit :
>> I just reread your original email, and I'm not sure I understand
>> what you meant regarding VACUUM ANALYZE. If you run that right
>> beforehand, do you still get the slow plan for user 10?
> I confirm by executing manual "VACUUM ANALYZE" that the problem is
> solved. But what i don't understand is that i would expect
> autovacuum to do the job.
I think this is the crux of the issue. Boosting the
default_statistics_target or the statistics target for specific
columns might help, reducing autovacuum_analyze_scale_factor might
help, but I can't help wondering whether you inserted a large number
of rows for user 10 and then ran the query to select user 10 before
autovacuum had time to complete. Does that seem possible?
-Kevin