Re: 512,600ms query becomes 7500ms... but why? Postgres 8.3 query planner quirk?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Kevin Grittner
Тема Re: 512,600ms query becomes 7500ms... but why? Postgres 8.3 query planner quirk?
Дата
Msg-id 4B752934020000250002F24E@gw.wicourts.gov
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: 512,600ms query becomes 7500ms... but why? Postgres 8.3 query planner quirk?  (Karl Denninger <karl@denninger.net>)
Ответы Re: 512,600ms query becomes 7500ms... but why? Postgres 8.3 query planner quirk?  (Karl Denninger <karl@denninger.net>)
Список pgsql-performance
Karl Denninger <karl@denninger.net> wrote:
Kevin Grittner wrote:

>> I suspect that the above might do pretty well in 8.4.

> "Exists" can be quite slow.  So can "not exists"
>
> See if you can re-write it using a sub-select - just replace the
> "exists ...." with "(select ...) is not null"
>
> Surprisingly this often results in a MUCH better query plan under
> Postgresql.  Why the planner evaluates it "better" eludes me (it
> shouldn't) but the differences are often STRIKING - I've seen
> factor-of-10 differences in execution performance.

Have you seen such a difference under 8.4?  Can you provide a
self-contained example?

-Kevin

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Karl Denninger
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 512,600ms query becomes 7500ms... but why? Postgres 8.3 query planner quirk?
Следующее
От: "Connors, Bill"
Дата:
Сообщение: Questions on plan with INSERT/SELECT on partitioned table