Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>> Fujii Masao wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
>>> <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>>> So you get those messages when the table is *not* a temporary table. I
>>>> can see now what Fujii was trying to say. His patch seems Ok, though
>>>> perhaps it would be better to move the responsibility of calling
>>>> XLogReportUnloggedStatement() to the callers of heap_sync(). When I put
>>>> it in heap_sync(), I didn't take into account that it's sometimes called
>>>> just to flush buffers from buffer cache, not to fsync() non-WAL-logged
>>>> operations.
>>> As you said, I moved the responsibility of calling XLogReportUnloggedStatement()
>>> to the callers of heap_sync(). Here is the patch.
>> Committed. The use_wal parameter to end_heap_rewrite() was not
>> necessary, that information is already in RewriteState, so I took that out.
>
> Are we going to bump up frontend/backend protocol version 3.0 to 3.x
> or some such?
No, this doesn't affect the normal FE/BE protocol. The message header
was added to the streaming replication messages that are sent within
CopyData messages.
-- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com