Re: Add on_perl_init and proper destruction to plperl [PATCH]

Tom Lane wrote:
> It's obvious that the people who want this are entirely willing
> to adopt a Pollyanna-ishly optimistic view about its potential
> to cause serious problems that we may or may not be able to fix.
>
> I don't really expect to be able to prevent something along this line
> from getting committed --- I'm merely hoping to circumscribe it as much
> as possible and get large WARNING items into the manual's description.
>
>   

Well, we seem to have got much closer to what you can live with on the 
END block issue, although we took a rather roundabout route to get there.

Perhaps with a little more work we can achieve something similar on the 
on_perl_init front (which, in any case, I don't regard as being as 
important as the END blocks, although Tim might not agree.)

cheers

andrew