Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> If you want an example of something I *do* have a process problem
> with, it's Kevin Grittner's attempts to get people to put a
> significant number of cycles into thinking about true
> serializability.
> Right now is not the time for that to be happening. I've been
> politely ignoring that thread, but ...
Not my motive, but if you think that'll be the effect of posting
milestone patches, I'll hold 'em back. Apologies if I caused a
disruption.
-Kevin