Re: Bloom index

> Yeah, (1) rand isn't a good random number generator and (2) fooling with

I tested rand() and random() generator and results was close to the same, and 
rand() was even slightly better.

> the main random number sequence is user-unfriendly.  If you need a
That's really easy to fix.

> private source of random numbers you might base it on erand48 like geqo
> has done.
Thank you to the point.

-- 
Teodor Sigaev                                   E-mail: teodor@sigaev.ru
  WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/