> Yeah, (1) rand isn't a good random number generator and (2) fooling with
I tested rand() and random() generator and results was close to the same, and
rand() was even slightly better.
> the main random number sequence is user-unfriendly. If you need a
That's really easy to fix.
> private source of random numbers you might base it on erand48 like geqo
> has done.
Thank you to the point.
--
Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teodor@sigaev.ru
WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/