Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>> I think it's a tools/build process problem and should be attacked that
>> way.
>
> Specifically, I think you missed out $(BE_DLLLIBS) in SHLIB_LINK.
> We'll find out at the next mingw build...
Thanks. But what is BE_DLLLIBS? I can't find any description of it.
I suspect the MinGW build will fail because of the missing PGDLLIMPORTs.
Before we sprinkle all the global variables it touches with that, let me
explain what I meant by dividing walreceiver code differently between
dynamically loaded module and backend code. Right now I have to go to
sleep, though, but I'll try to get back to during the weekend.
-- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com