Re: Hard limit on WAL space used (because PANIC sucks)
| От | MauMau |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Hard limit on WAL space used (because PANIC sucks) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4B4E81C123184410B92AA8E8EBA73C7A@maumau обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Hard limit on WAL space used (because PANIC sucks) ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> > On 06/08/2013 11:27 AM, Andres Freund wrote: >> You know, the PANIC isn't there just because we like to piss of >> users. There's actual technical reasons that don't just go away by >> judging the PANIC as stupid. > > Yes I know we aren't trying to piss off users. What I am saying is that it > is stupid to the user that it PANICS. I apologize if that came out wrong. I've experienced PANIC shutdown several times due to WAL full during development. As a user, one problem with PANIC is that it dumps core. I think core files should be dumped only when "can't happen" events has occurred like PostgreSQL's bug. I didn't expect postgres dumps core simply because disk is full. I want postgres to shutdown with FATAL message in that exact case. Regards MauMau
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: