Re: plpython3
| От | Josh Berkus |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: plpython3 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4B4D46B6.90808@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: plpython3 (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: plpython3
Re: plpython3 |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> So it seems to me that the threshold question for this patch is - do > we think it's a good idea to maintain two implementations of PL/python > in core? Not really, no. This is why we need PGAN ;-) If the new implementation is *better* that the existing PL/python, I could see eventually replacing it. It wouldn't be the first time that a rewrite exceeded the original tool. However, I'm not in a position to judge quality. --Josh Berkus
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: