Re: Typed tables

> 
> What is the point of this discussion? We're not going to remove the 
> facility for composite types, regardless of whether or not some people 
> regard them as unnecessary. And "a name that better suits the task" is 
> not to be sneered at anyway.
> 

I never asked for anything to be removed nor do I sneer :)  Honestly, I 
was only trying to understand why it existed.

-- 
Andrew Chernow
eSilo, LLC
every bit counts
http://www.esilo.com/