Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On mån, 2010-01-11 at 15:02 -0500, Andrew Chernow wrote:
>> ISTM that the ultimate would be a 'create table (...._) without storage'
>> (or some'm) and make 'create type' an alternate syntax for SQL
>> conformance.
>
> I don't really understand the purpose of that.
>
What is the point of CREATE TYPE name AS () syntax? Why would one use create
type when there is create table? Does it provide additional functionality I am
unaware of or does it exist for comformance reasons?
--
Andrew Chernow
eSilo, LLC
every bit counts
http://www.esilo.com/