Re: Application name patch - v3

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Guillaume Lelarge
Тема Re: Application name patch - v3
Дата
Msg-id 4B45FEDE.9090207@lelarge.info
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Application name patch - v3  (Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>)
Ответы Re: Application name patch - v3  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Le 04/01/2010 22:36, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
> Le 29/12/2009 14:12, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
>> Le 29/12/2009 00:03, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
>>> Le 28/12/2009 22:59, Tom Lane a écrit :
>>>> Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> writes:
>>>>> Le 28/12/2009 17:06, Tom Lane a écrit :
>>>>>> I think we were stalled on the question of whether to use one array
>>>>>> or two parallel arrays.  Do you want to try coding up a sample usage
>>>>>> of each possibility so we can see which one seems more useful?
>>>>
>>>>> I'm interested in working on this. But I don't find the thread that talk
>>>>> about this.
>>>>
>>>> Try here
>>>> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4AAE8CCF.9070808@esilo.com
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks. I've read all the "new version of PQconnectdb" and "Determining
>>> client_encoding from client locale" threads. I think I understand the
>>> goal. Still need to re-read this one
>>> (http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/6222.1253734019@sss.pgh.pa.us) and
>>> completely understand it (will probably need to look at the code, at
>>> least the PQconnectdb one). But I'm definitely working on this.
>>>
>>
>> If I try to sum up my readings so far, this is what we still have to do:
>>
>> 1. try the one-array approach
>>    PGconn *PQconnectParams(const char **params)
>>
>> 2. try the two-arrays approach
>>    PGconn *PQconnectParams(const char **keywords, const char **values)
>>
>> Instead of doing a wrapper around PQconnectdb, we need to refactor the
>> whole function, so that we can get rid of the parsing of the conninfo
>> string (which is quite complicated).
>>
>> Using psql as an example would be a good idea, AFAICT.
>>
>> Am I right? did I misunderstand or forget something?
>>
> 
> I supposed I was right since noone yell at me :)
> 
> I worked on this tonight. You'll find two patches attached, one for the
> one-array approach, one for the two-arrays approach. I know some more
> factoring can be done (at least, the "get the fallback resources..."
> part). I'm OK to do them. I just need to know if I'm on the right track.
> 

Hmmm... sorry but... can i have some comments on these two patches, please?


-- 
Guillaume.http://www.postgresqlfr.orghttp://dalibo.com


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Buffer statistics for pg_stat_statements
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Patch: Allow substring/replace() to get/set bit values