Tom Lane wrote:
> I agree with Heikki that it would be better not to commit as long as
> any clear showstoppers remain unresolved.
I agree that it would be better not to commit as long as any of the
following are true:
(1) There are any known issues which would break things for clusters *not using* hot standby.
(2) There isn't an easy way for to disable configuration of hot standby.
(3) There is significant doubt that the vast majority of the patch will be useful in the eventually-enabled final
solution.
If none of these are true, I'm not sure what the down side of a commit
is.
-Kevin