Re: Voting: "pg_ctl init" versus "initdb"
| От | Greg Smith |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Voting: "pg_ctl init" versus "initdb" |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4B00C3F1.3040901@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Voting: "pg_ctl init" versus "initdb" (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Voting: "pg_ctl init" versus "initdb"
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane wrote:
Exactly. I think the best transition design would be to make "initdb" and "init" both work.Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:If we did add an extra option then the option would be "initdb" not "init". It would take us all years to remove all evidence of the phrase "initdb" from the mailing lists and our minds."init" is already embedded in various packagers' initscripts. And I thought the entire point of this proposal was that we could expunge knowledge of initdb from users' minds.
-- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support greg@2ndQuadrant.com www.2ndQuadrant.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: