Re: Listen / Notify rewrite
| От | Andrew Chernow |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Listen / Notify rewrite |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4AFD6359.70603@esilo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Listen / Notify rewrite (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Listen / Notify rewrite
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> spill to disk and need an efficient storage mechanism. The natural > implementation of this in Postgres would be a table, not the slru. If This is what I think the people's real problem is, the implementation becomes a more complex when including payloads (larger ones even more so). I think its a side-track to discuss queue vs condition variables. Whether a notify is 20 bytes through the network or 8192 bytes doesn't change its design or purpose, only its size. Calling this a creeping feature is quite a leap. -- Andrew Chernow eSilo, LLC every bit counts http://www.esilo.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: