Re: Should we warn users about SETs which have no effect?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Josh Berkus
Тема Re: Should we warn users about SETs which have no effect?
Дата
Msg-id 4AE7277F.3040708@agliodbs.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Should we warn users about SETs which have no effect?  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 10/27/09 9:36 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Hackers,
> 
> There are some GUCs you can set in a context which will accept them, yet
> they have no effect when you do.  For example, I can call SET
> statement_timeout inside a function, and it has no effect whatsoever.
> 
> I'm wondering if we should be throwing a warning in these cases.  And
> how many such cases there are.  Thoughts?

Hmmmm, clarification: this applies to SET LOCAL, specifically.

---Josh


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Delete cascade with three levels bug ?
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: FOR UPDATE versus WITH --- change 8.4 too?