ECPG dynamic cursorname patch revised and split Re: CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on

Robert Haas írta:
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at> wrote:
>   
>> Hi,
>>
>> Michael Meskes írta:
>>     
>>> It is accepted either way. I was just pointing out that it might be easier to
>>> review/commit at least parts of your patches if they can be applied seperately.
>>>
>>>       
>> I have split up (and cleaned up a little) the dynamic
>> cursorname patch into smaller logical, easier-to-review
>> pieces. Descriptions below.
>>
>> ...
>> After every patch (except 4) both the core and ecpg
>> "make check" are successful.
>>     
>
> It would've been nice if you'd changed the subject line before posting these.
>   

At 3am, I forgot this. :(
I hope the archive threading doesn't break and
my previous mail will be referenced by this one.

> Also, please update commitfest.postgresql.org appropriately.
>   

I just did, thanks for the reminder.

Best regards,
Zoltán Böszörményi

-- 
Bible has answers for everything. Proof:
"But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more
than these cometh of evil." (Matthew 5:37) - basics of digital technology.
"May your kingdom come" - superficial description of plate tectonics

----------------------------------
Zoltán Böszörményi
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
http://www.postgresql.at/