Re: Large fixed-width text

Dave Page napsal(a): <blockquote cite="mid:937d27e10909271216l11e31934h354b1f5fc5609dbe@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite"><prewrap="">On 9/27/09, Petr Jelinek <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:pjmodos@pjmodos.net"><pjmodos@pjmodos.net></a>wrote: </pre><blockquote type="cite"><pre wrap="">Dave
Pagenapsal(a):   </pre><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><pre wrap="">Anyway those #txtArchives pre and
#txtArchivestt do not affect
 
documentation but they indeed seem to be plain wrong, they are actually
only
used by Opera (and maybe Chrome , I don't have that browser) and the text
looks huge there. In FF and Safari they are overwritten by

#pgContainer code, #pgContainer pre, #pgContainer tt { font-size: 1.2em;
}

in geckofixes.css (yes it loads for Safari too on my machine and it's a
good
thing) and in IE they're overwritten by

* html #txtArchives pre { font-size: 100%; }

in iefixes.css.
       </pre></blockquote><pre wrap="">txtArchives is used by archives.postgresql.org, not the docs.
     </pre></blockquote><pre wrap="">Cite from the first sentence: *Anyway those #txtArchives pre and
#txtArchives tt do not affect
documentation*
   </pre></blockquote><pre wrap="">
Yes, i did read what you wrote. I was pointing out what they do affect. </pre></blockquote><br /> Oh, ok, I know they
affectmail body in archives and all I said is true - they are overwritten by other rules in most browsers and the text
ishuge in browsers where they're not overwritten. I think better default would be 120%, it may still look big somewhere
butnot as big as it does now and it compensates for that monospace vs normal font default size.<br /><br /><pre
class="moz-signature"cols="72">-- 
 
Regards
Petr Jelinek (PJMODOS)</pre>