Guillaume Smet wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Magnus Hagander<magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>> Hmm, it would be good if somebody who knows more about it than me
>> could confirm this, but it looks like the sitemap needs to contain
>> *every URL in the docs* to be effective. The one we have now just
>> contains the root path of each version, but it seems it doesn't apply
>> to subpages?
>
> That's what the customer we have who knows SEO very well does: they
> even generate several sitemaps as they have too much pages for one
> sitemap.
so we would have to include all urls in the docs to make it effective?
>
> Note that the google webmaster tools let you upload sitemaps directly
> so that you can check they are well formed and taken into account.
well it is well formed though I guess google cannot magically guess on
what we really want to get as a result :)
Stefan