Re: totally different plan when using partitions
| От | Richard Huxton |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: totally different plan when using partitions |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4A843818.1020500@archonet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: totally different plan when using partitions (Scara Maccai <m_lists@yahoo.it>) |
| Ответы |
Re: totally different plan when using partitions
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Scara Maccai wrote: > > set enable_mergejoin=off; > set enable_hashjoin=off > > http://explain-analyze.info/query_plans/3817-query-plan-2525 Ah, good - that's useful. > As you can see, the 2 root partition roots (teststscell73 and teststscell13) take > > teststscell73: 3.90 * 30120 loops = 117468 cost > teststscell13: 3.89 * 15964 loops = 62099 cost > > total: 179567 cost out of 377398 total cost of the query... Your original "slow" query was only estimated at a cost of 70000 - it's still going to be preferred even if you do get these to zero. Once the cost estimates bear more of a relation to run-times things might improve. -- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: