Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
>> However I'm guessing that what actually happens is that heap_update is
>> returning HeapTupleSelfUpdated instead, which the code states as
>> /* nothing to do */.
>
> Yeah.
>
>> I imagine this is so because of some old fiddling to get semantics just
>> right for obscure corner cases, but it feels wrong nevertheless.
>
> I suspect it was reluctance to use the EvalPlanQual semantics (which
> are pretty bogus in their own way) for perfectly deterministic
> single-transaction cases.
still the current behaviour feels quite wrong because even after the
update the modified tuple still satisfies the WHERE clause of the DELETE
but still it won't actually get deleted.
Stefan