Re: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m?

> I don't think that's the name of the parameter, since a Google search
> gives zero hits.  There are so many fiddly parameters for this thing
> that I don't want to speculate about which one you meant.

Sorry, subject line had it correct.

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/runtime-config-client.html#GUC-VACUUM-FREEZE-MIN-AGE


--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
www.pgexperts.com