Re: SE-PostgreSQL Specifications

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От KaiGai Kohei
Тема Re: SE-PostgreSQL Specifications
Дата
Msg-id 4A71563F.3090504@ak.jp.nec.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: SE-PostgreSQL Specifications  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 July 2009 15:36:29 KaiGai Kohei wrote:
>> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> On Sunday 26 July 2009 14:35:41 Sam Mason wrote:
>>>> I'm coming to the conclusion that you really need to link to external
>>>> material here; there must be good (and canonical) definitions of these
>>>> things outside and because SE-PG isn't self contained I really think you
>>>> need to link to them.
>>> This is not supposed to be user documentation.  It's supposed to be a
>>> feature specification that an implementation can be validated against.
>> Hmm...
>> What kind of descriptions are necessary for a feature specifications?
> 
> It describes what the feature does and why.
> 
>> Currently, I guess the specification describes when/where the security
>> hook should be invoked, what permission should be checked and what result
>> should be returned for each security hooks.
>>
>> Is it correct? Or, do you expect any other stuffs?
> 
> That is a pretty good start, but it's drifting into implementation details.
> 
>> Apart from that, user documentation is also necessary.
>> If the specification should be described from completely different
>> viewpoint, I'll provide it.
> 
> Yes, user documentation will eventually also be necessary, and the original 
> specification may be usable as a source for that.  I'm just reacting to those 
> who commented whether or not references should be added and what reference 
> style the documentation uses.  We're not there yet.  The purpose of this 
> document is to explain what the feature does, not to teach users to use the 
> feature.

For a couple of days, I have paid my efforts to provide the design
specifications more than user documentations.
(But a few sections are under construction.)

http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/SEPostgreSQL_Development

Some of sections are copied from the SEPostgreSQL_Draft and edited,
rest of sections are also revised to represent its feature and behavior
more correctly.

At the current moment, I can agree it is too early to discuss the style
for user documentation. So, I would like to freeze the efforts to the
user documentation for a while, and begin to discuss the design specification
which focuses on developers.

Thanks,
-- 
OSS Platform Development Division, NEC
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [RFC] new digest datatypes, or generic fixed-len hex types?
Следующее
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 8.4 win32 shared memory patch