Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Sunday 26 July 2009 14:35:41 Sam Mason wrote:
>> I'm coming to the conclusion that you really need to link to external
>> material here; there must be good (and canonical) definitions of these
>> things outside and because SE-PG isn't self contained I really think you
>> need to link to them.
>
> This is not supposed to be user documentation. It's supposed to be a feature
> specification that an implementation can be validated against.
>
Hmm...
What kind of descriptions are necessary for a feature specifications?
Currently, I guess the specification describes when/where the security
hook should be invoked, what permission should be checked and what result
should be returned for each security hooks.
Is it correct? Or, do you expect any other stuffs?
Apart from that, user documentation is also necessary.
If the specification should be described from completely different viewpoint,
I'll provide it.
Thanks,
--
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>