Re: Server Backup: pg_dump vs pg_dumpall

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Ben Chobot
Тема Re: Server Backup: pg_dump vs pg_dumpall
Дата
Msg-id 4A64F1BE.50202@silentmedia.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Server Backup: pg_dump vs pg_dumpall  (APseudoUtopia <apseudoutopia@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
APseudoUtopia wrote:
> I'm writing a backup script. Right now, I only have one database on my
> postgresql server. I'm deciding if I should use pg_dump or pg_dumpall
> when backing up the server. As far as I can tell, pg_dumpall cannot
> compress the dumps automatically and it only dumps data in the
> standard SQL text file format. This means that I would not be able to
> use pg_restore to selectively restore the database, correct?
>
> What is *NOT* included in a pg_dump that IS in pg_dumpall (Other than
> all the databases)? Things like user-defined functions and datatypes?
> Roles? Views?
>
> I was leaning towards pg_dumpall, but then I realized that it only
> dumps in the standard SQL text file format, and it cannot be
> compressed automatically.

Things that span all databases in your cluster (like your roles) do not
get saved with pg_dump. So yes, if you only have one database,
pg_dumpall is probably what you should be using. You can always pipe the
output of pg_dumpall to your compression program of choice.

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Scott Marlowe
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: killing processes
Следующее
От: John R Pierce
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Server Backup: pg_dump vs pg_dumpall