Re: random slow query
| От | Mike Ivanov |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: random slow query |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4A4A630E.4080601@activestate.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: random slow query (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
Scott Marlowe wrote: > Close, but it'll use that memory for cache. Large buffers are not > typical in linux, large kernel caches are. > OK, we're talking about different things. You're right. > If that tutorial says that, then that tutorial is wrong. I'm guessing > what that tutorial is talking about, and what top is saying are two > very different things though. > Then it is an amazingly common misconception. I guess it first appeared in some book and then reproduced by zillion blogs. Essentially this is what Goolgle brings you on 'swap cache' query. Thanks for clearing that out. >>> It's normal, and shouldn't worry anybody. In fact it's a good sign >>> that you're not using way too much memory for any one process >> It says exactly the opposite. >> This time I agree :-) Cheers, Mike
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: