Re: [PATCH] [v8.5] Security checks on largeobjects
| От | KaiGai Kohei |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [PATCH] [v8.5] Security checks on largeobjects |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4A47FD8D.8090705@ak.jp.nec.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] [v8.5] Security checks on largeobjects (Bernd Helmle <mailings@oopsware.de>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] [v8.5] Security checks on largeobjects
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bernd Helmle wrote:
> --On 26. Juni 2009 13:08:37 +0900 KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>
> wrote:
>
>> * Is the named large object (including fully qualified one) worth?
>> It will enables us to specify a largeobject with human readable
>> identifier string.
>
> I don't understand the notion of this. Does this mean you can create a
> LO with an identifier string, generated from (e.g.) your application?
Yes, it intends to assign an identifier string not only numeric
large object identifier. The identifier string can be qualified
with a certain namespace as follows.
E.g)SELECT lo_open('my_picture01', x'40000'::int);SELECT lo_create('pg_temp.my_musid02');
In the later case, the new largeobject will be reclaimed after
the session closed due to the temporary namespace.
Thanks,
--
OSS Platform Development Division, NEC
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: