<tt>Looks good.<br /> Working fine on linux and windows :)<br /><br /> Dave Page wrote:</tt><blockquote
cite="mid:937d27e10906260111w43c18824u86a36bf2ed116948@mail.gmail.com"type="cite"><pre wrap=""><tt>On Fri, Jun 26, 2009
at5:50 AM, Ashesh
Vashi<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:ashesh.vashi@enterprisedb.com"><ashesh.vashi@enterprisedb.com></a>wrote:
</tt></pre><blockquote type="cite"><pre wrap=""><tt>That's really weird.
I tried that patch on windows and found that - the behavior of wxMutex is
not as expected. :(
On Gtk (Ubuntu 9.04 32bit), the message-box does not adjust to the length of
the title message.
(Please find the attached screen-shot.)
Please find the updated patch, it is working on gtk & windows both.
Though it has not been tested on Osx, but I think - it should work.
</tt></pre></blockquote><pre wrap=""><tt>
Per IM discussion, I've removed the mutex altogether. This code all
gets called in the primary UI thread, so there's actually no
concurrency issue until the script actually starts, thus we can
protect it with a simple static bool.
I suspect this is why the mutex didn't behave as expected - it's
intended to keep different threads out of the protected area.
Tests OK on OSX.</tt> </pre></blockquote><tt></tt><div class="moz-signature"><tt>-- <br /></tt><div
class="moz-signature"><tt><font color="#666666">Thanks & Regards,<br /> Ashesh Vashi<br /><br /> EnterpriseDB
INDIA:<a href="http://www.enterprisedb.com">http://www.enterprisedb.com</a></font></tt></div></div>