On 06/24/2009 11:45 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 06/24/2009 11:12 AM, Dave Page wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Andres Freund<andres@anarazel.de>
>> wrote:
>>> On 06/24/2009 10:35 AM, Dave Page wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Andres Freund<andres@anarazel.de>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I found the issue. The code compares '(unsigned int)(-1)' with
>>>>> '(size_t)(-1)' which works on 32bit but not on 64bit.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Andres - patch applied.
>>>
>>> I havent read very much of the code, but at a very quick glance a short
>>> policing for issues of this kind looks sensible - unfortunately I
>>> cant do
>>> this in due time (I think I have spotted some more comparisons of
>>> this kind
>>> - I am not sure how big the influence of those is though).
>>
>> Yeah, that certainly wouldn't hurt. If you spot anything in passing,
>> please point it out.
> I have only looked at the source code of ctlSQLBox - but there is a wild
> mixature of unsigned int (32bit, unsigned), int(32bit signed),
> long(64bit signed), size_t(64bit signed unsigned) datatypes which are
> assigned in most of the possible combinations.
> If I have glanced correctly nothing triggers unless somebody gets the
> idea to edit a 1GB+ file... But then it probably would trigger on 32bit
> as well.
For some fun I tried loading a 1GB+ file and it crashed earlier
(wxUtfFile::Read) ;-)
Andres