Re: 2 tables or two db?
| От | Rob Sargent |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: 2 tables or two db? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4A3A5DF4.1090409@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | 2 tables or two db? (ivan marchesini <marchesini@unipg.it>) |
| Список | pgsql-sql |
ivan marchesini wrote: > Dear postgres users, > > Suppose I have two tables of data. > > suppose the two table are really similar in dimensions > > suppose they will receive the same number and type of queries. > > in tems of performance (velocity of answer) it is better to place the > two tables in the same db or into two different db? > > may be it is a stupid question, but.... > > many many thanks... > > Ivan > > > > > My guess is that only physical separation will have any positive impact otherwise the two datasets are competing for the same resources. At least separate discs, controllers to avoid disc contention. Separate postgres instances to allow separate caches (in affect separate memory).
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: