Tom Lane wrote:
> But I'd be just as happy with a naming convention, like
> <planner:rowcount> versus <actual:rowcount>, etc. I don't know
> enough about XML usage to understand the benefits and costs of
> different ways of providing that kind of structure.
>
>
FYI, you probably don't want this. the ':' is not just another character, it separates the namespace designator from
thelocal name. We probably only want one namespace. You can use '-' or '_' or '.' inside names to give them some
structurebeyond XML semantics.
cheers
andrew