Re: autovacuum hung?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Brian Cox
Тема Re: autovacuum hung?
Дата
Msg-id 4A22BDEF.9090103@ca.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на autovacuum hung?  (Brian Cox <brian.cox@ca.com>)
Ответы Re: autovacuum hung?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-performance
Tom Lane [tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us] wrote:
>
> Are those processes actually doing anything, or just waiting?  strace
> or local equivalent would be the most conclusive check.
These must not have been hung, because they finally completed (after
10-15 hrs - some time between 11pm and 8am). Question is why does it
take so long to do this on such a relatively small table?

> This query isn't very helpful because it fails to show locks that are
> not directly associated with tables.
How can that (locks not directly associated...) be determined?


Thanks,
Brian

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Fabrix
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Scalability in postgres
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: autovacuum hung?