Re: raid10 hard disk choice
| От | Craig James |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: raid10 hard disk choice |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4A158B07.2080702@emolecules.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: raid10 hard disk choice (Matthew Wakeling <matthew@flymine.org>) |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
Matthew Wakeling wrote: > On Thu, 21 May 2009, Linos wrote: >> i have to buy a new server and in the budget i have (small) i have >> to select one of this two options: >> >> -4 sas 146gb 15k rpm raid10. >> -8 sas 146gb 10k rpm raid10. > > It depends what you are doing. I think in most situations, the second > option is better, but there may be a few situations where the reverse is > true. > > Basically, the first option will only be faster if you are doing lots of > seeking (small requests) in a single thread. As soon as you go > multi-threaded or are looking at sequential scans, you're better off > with more discs. Since you have to share the disks with a file server, which might be heavily used, the 8-disk array will probably be bettereven if you're doing lots of seeking in a single thread. Craig
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: