Re: Help with join syntax sought
От | Andy Colson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Help with join syntax sought |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4A1324C9.3040101@squeakycode.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Help with join syntax sought ("James B. Byrne" <byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca>) |
Ответы |
Re: Help with join syntax sought
|
Список | pgsql-general |
James B. Byrne wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2009 17:02, Andy Colson wrote: > >> so: select max(name), type from food group by type >> works cuz we only get one name (the max name) back for each type. >> >> or: select name, type from food group by type, name >> which in our example is kinda pointless, but still, give us the >> distinct >> items for "type, name". > > Thanks. I think I am beginning to see this. So, if there are more > than one type for a given currency code and I do not select and > group by type then the having count(whatever) = 1 means that these > rows are not selected either. Is that correct? > > I'm not familiar with your data, and I didn't study your sql very hard. I'm not sure what this will do: HAVING COUNT(fxr.currency_code_quote) = 1 The only time I have ever used HAVING is like: select name from something group by name having count(*) > 1 to find duplicate name's. you're group by is on 5 fields, but the count is only on one.... so... If a count is in the select part (like select count(name) from stuff) it only counts when name is not null... so maybe that having is saying count where currency_code_quote is not null and there is only one record per group... I dunno. -Andy
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: