Re: unconfirmed bug #4784

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Magnus Hagander
Тема Re: unconfirmed bug #4784
Дата
Msg-id 4A07E8AD.7030009@hagander.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на unconfirmed bug #4784  (Jörg Kiegeland <kiegeland@ikv.de>)
Список pgsql-bugs
Jörg Kiegeland wrote:
> Hi,
> Approx. 2 weeks ago, I posted a bug which got the ID 4784. However I got
> no response to it, and it not occurs in the mbox of April or May.
> This bug is quite important to us, since it was reported by our
> customer. So I would like to know if this bug is still being checked /
> on a waiting list to be checked,
> or if it is somehow lost.

Hi,

since it's not available in the archives, it appears not to have been
delivered to the lists. My bet is that it got caught in the spamfilter
(the traffic from the bug report form goes to a standard mailinglist, so
it's subject to the same antispam as other posts). We did have some
issues with the spamfilter a couple of weeks ago, so it may have been
lost then.

Please resubmit the bugreport.

//Magnus

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jörg Kiegeland
Дата:
Сообщение: unconfirmed bug #4784
Следующее
От: Thomas Johansson
Дата:
Сообщение: Is this the expected behaviour for DDL-query execution?