Re: per db collate syntax
| От | Heikki Linnakangas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: per db collate syntax |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 49EE059B.9050507@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | per db collate syntax (Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Jaime Casanova wrote: > I was trying to create a database and found that we are using > LC_COLLATE and LC_CTYPE, why not simply COLLATE and CTYPE? This was discussed recently, and in fact changed from COLLATE/CTYPE to LC_COLLATE/LC_CTYPE. The reason is that LC_COLLATE and LC_CTYPE makes it more clear that the options set the LC_COLLATE and LC_CTYPE environment variables. There is also precedent: the pre-existing initdb options were called --lc-collate and --lc-ctype,so the new createdb options are quite naturally also called --lc-collate and --lc-ctype, and since they're called that, it would be weird if the CREATE DATABASE options had different names. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: