Re: Unicode support
| От | Kevin Grittner |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Unicode support |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 49E47D9B.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Unicode support (Greg Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: >> SELECT U&'\00E9', char_length(U&'\00E9'); >> ?column? | char_length >> ----------+------------- >> é | 1 >> (1 row) >> >> SELECT U&'\0065\0301', char_length(U&'\0065\0301'); >> ?column? | char_length >> ----------+------------- >> é | 2 >> (1 row) > > What's really at issue is "what is a string?". That is, it a > sequence of characters or a sequence of code points. Doesn't the SQL standard refer to them as "character string literals"? The function is called character_length or char_length. I'm curious -- can every multi-code-point character be normalized to a single-code-point character? -Kevin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: