Re: Closing some 8.4 open items

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Josh Berkus
Тема Re: Closing some 8.4 open items
Дата
Msg-id 49DE3D5C.1040109@agliodbs.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Closing some 8.4 open items  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 4/9/09 10:42 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andrew Dunstan<andrew@dunslane.net>  writes:
>>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> Peter Eisentraut<peter_e@gmx.net>  writes:
>>>>> Here is my thinking, and considering that that would basically involve a
>>>>> forward-looking design decision right now, I would support dropping the
>>>>> cardinality() function from 8.4 (if people agree that this is in fact the
>>>>> design decision to make).
>>>> At this point I'd support that too.
>>> +1
>> Since there were no objections, and there is no time left before beta1,
>> I'm going to go ahead and remove cardinality().
>
> Do we want a TODO?
>

No, I don't think so.  It would just be a tag-on to whatever TODO we 
already have about implementing multisets and collections.

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
www.pgexperts.com


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: TODO item
Следующее
От: "Jignesh K. Shah"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Closing some 8.4 open items