Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
>
>> Here is my thinking, and considering that that would basically involve a
>> forward-looking design decision right now, I would support dropping the
>> cardinality() function from 8.4 (if people agree that this is in fact the
>> design decision to make).
>>
>
> At this point I'd support that too. It doesn't seem that getting
> cardinality() into 8.4 is important enough to risk making a decision
> that we'd regret later. And I think it's not hard to make the case
> that we might regret either of the other choices later, depending on
> where we go with arrays.
>
>
>
+1
cheers
andrew