Actually, we have four basic theme ideas:
1) Smarter PG: more ability to develop "smart" applications on PG (David)
Pro: It's what we do as a project
Con: very similar to our theme last year
2) Fastest Developing Database: putting out a release *every* year, no
matter what (Josh)
Pro: timely, given issues with other DBMSes
Con: very similar to our theme last year
3) Maturity: After many years of development, PG has become
feature-complete in many areas. (Bruce)
Pro: accurate
Con: "maturity" ~ "stagnation"
4) BI/OLAP: focus on Windowing/Recursive.
Pro: industry buzzword-compliant
Con: don't have rest of toolset (Cube,etc.), ignores several major
features.
Given these, I'd think that combining (1) and (2) would probably be our
best route. Thoughts?
--Josh