Re: New trigger option of pg_standby

>>> Guillaume Smet <guillaume.smet@gmail.com> wrote: 
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
wrote:
>> Yeah, I agree... but there may be scripts for warm-standby based on
>> the existing default behavior. So, I didn't make a new trigger the
default.
> 
> I don't use pg_standby personnaly but I admit I'm quite surprised by
> the current behaviour. I'm pretty sure a lot of the current users
> would be surprised too.
I find it hard to imagine a use case for the existing default
behavior.
-Kevin